Energy Transition

E-methane is gaining global attention. (Image source: Synergy)

E-methane, a synthetic gas that holds immense potential for the future of energy, is quickly gaining global attention

Although the commercial production of e-methane has yet to begin, the momentum behind this innovative technology is growing rapidly.

E-methane is produced through a process that combines low-emission hydrogen with a carbon source, such as captured CO2 or biomass. This process results in a synthetic gas that closely mimics the physical and chemical properties of conventional natural gas.

The growing interest in e-methane is driven by its potential to play a critical role in the energy transition. As the world seeks to reduce its reliance on fossil fuels and lower greenhouse gas emissions, the need for low-emission alternatives to natural gas is becoming increasingly urgent. E-methane offers a unique advantage in this regard. It can be used within the existing methane network, providing a way to decarbonise natural gas without the immediate need for new infrastructure investments.

Furthermore, e-methane could serve as a bridge between today’s methane networks and the hydrogen networks of the future. Hydrogen is often touted as a key component of the future energy system, but its widespread adoption is hindered by challenges related to storage, transportation, and infrastructure compatibility. E-methane, which behaves almost identically to natural gas, could ease the transition to a hydrogen-based energy system by allowing for a gradual integration of hydrogen into existing gas grids.

Unlike hydrogen, which requires advanced and costly storage solutions, e-methane can be stored on a large scale in existing infrastructure, such as depleted natural gas fields and underground aquifers. This ability to store e-methane in significant quantities makes it an ideal solution for addressing seasonal energy demand variations. During periods of high demand, stored e-methane can be released into the grid, ensuring a reliable supply of energy even when renewable sources like wind and solar are not producing at full capacity.

The economic challenge

Despite its many advantages, e-methane faces a significant hurdle: cost. The current levelised cost of e-methane is estimated to range between US$50 and US$200 per million British thermal units (MMBtu), which is substantially higher than traditional natural gas prices or landed LNG prices. For e-methane to become a viable alternative to natural gas, substantial reductions in production costs are necessary.

This cost challenge is not insurmountable, but it will require significant advancements in technology and economies of scale. By 2040 or 2050, it is anticipated that the cost of e-methane could be reduced to a level that makes it competitive with traditional natural gas, particularly as carbon pricing and other regulatory measures increasingly penalise the use of fossil fuels.

In the meantime, the first e-methane projects are beginning to take shape. Japan has emerged as a leading proponent of e-methane, viewing it as a critical component of its energy strategy. The country has set an ambitious target: by 2050, 90% of city gas demand is expected to be met by e-methane. This commitment is driven by Japan’s need to secure a stable and low-carbon energy supply, as the country seeks to reduce its dependence on imported fossil fuels and meet its climate goals.

E-methane looks to become a key player in the global energy transition. Its compatibility with existing gas infrastructure, ability to serve as a bridge to a hydrogen-based energy system, and potential for large-scale storage make it an attractive option for decarbonising the natural gas sector.

This article is authored by Synergy Consulting IFA

The new solution helps carbon storage developers quantify the risks associated with wells at prospective storage sites. (Image source: SLB)

SLB has launched a well integrity assessment solution that helps carbon storage developers quantify the risks associated with wells at prospective storage sites with previous drilling activity

Establishing secure storage sites is essential to enabling growth of CCUS and creating a low carbon energy ecosystem. However, many prospective carbon storage sites are located in either mature or retired oil and gas fields. Having a large number of wells at a site can increase the risk of potential leakage pathways for the stored carbon.

Understanding the risks

SLB’s new methodology for quantifying the probability and potential impact of carbon leakage helps customers understand the risks associated with each well, informing remediation strategies and ultimately estimating the project's long-term viability. The solution incorporates advanced failure mode effect and criticality analysis (FMECA) to assess potential leakage pathways, well barrier, failure mechanisms and resulting consequences. Using advanced multi-physics 3D modeling, SLB can assess the volume and flow rates of brine and carbon leakage over time to better estimate risk.

“The significance of the risks associated with each well and the costs of remediation to mitigate leakage risks can make a project economically unfeasible,” said Frederik Majkut, senior vice president of Industrial Decarbonization, SLB. “By addressing potential well integrity issues early in the development process, SLB’s well integrity assessment solution can help storage developers avoid costly delays or operational disruptions, and drive companies toward their net zero ambitions.”